51黑料

Skip to content

'Remarkably poor judgment': Wall Street Journal takes a critical eye to start of Trump's 2nd term

b68c6f441565bca23b2a51435095977a15458407308ca5849991030d79e45dcd
President Donald Trump speaks to the media after he and first lady Melania Trump stepped off Air Force One upon their arrival at Asheville Regional Airport in Fletcher, N.C., Friday, Jan. 24, 2025. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Amid all of the enthusiasm in conservative media for President Donald Trump's first week back in office, the Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal has notably applied some brakes.

The Journal has editorialized against Trump's , called presidential appointee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggested Trump give up the effort to end and twice said he was wrong to of former officials under threat from Iran.

The newspaper also said that Trump showed in selling $Trump brand crypto coins and described as the president's order delaying implementation of a law that would have forced TikTok's shutdown in the U.S.

It stands in contrast to the excitement shown about Trump at some outlets popular with conservatives, including the Murdoch-owned Fox 51黑料 Channel, which had a segment on Monday about whether Trump's into Mount Rushmore.

鈥淭rump in four days has cemented his status as the G.O.A.T. 鈥 the greatest Republican president of all time, better than (Ronald) Reagan or Abraham Lincoln,鈥 Wayne Allyn Root wrote in World Net Daily. 鈥淎nd I'm writing this on his fifth day!鈥

There's still some muscle left in newspaper editorials

The Journal is also showing that there is muscle left in the idea of newspaper editorials, after decisions by owners of The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times last fall not to endorse a candidate in the presidential race between Trump and Kamala Harris.

The Journal is a respected legacy news organization. Its news pages are not driven by a political point of view, but its editorial pages have long been a leader in conservative thought. Its editorial writers have praised some of Trump's early moves, including dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and attempts to open Alaska to more development.

On Inauguration Day, the Journal that Trump 鈥渄elivered a message of aspiration and optimism that most Americans will welcome. If this captures his real plans, he has a chance to leave office in four years as a success.鈥

But in the details, the Journal has found some of Trump's action wanting. The pardon of Jan. 6 rioters 鈥渋s a rotten message from a president about political violence done on his behalf, and it's a bait-and-switch,鈥 the newspaper said, pointing to earlier Trump comments that he would be looking at individual cases.

Trump's decision to strip government-paid security from his former aides Mike Pompeo, John Bolton and Brian Hook 鈥 all threatened by Iran 鈥 鈥渓ooks like a new low,鈥 the Journal said. 鈥淒ecisions about security details are supposed to be based on neutral assessments of the danger, not some vindictive whim,鈥 an editorial published on Jan. 24 said.

The newspaper also had sharp words for Trump's decision to enter the crypto market. 鈥淚n his first term, Mr. Trump was often deterred from some of his worst impulses by legal advisers who saw their job as serving the presidency as much as the president,鈥 the newspaper said. 鈥淭he crypto caper is a worrisome sign that Mr. Trump's current advisers don't understand the difference any better than he does, or that they are too cowed to speak up.鈥

Paul Gigot, editor of the Journal's editorial page, said that 鈥渨e are covering Trump like we do every president, and that means supporting his decisions when they warrant it, and criticizing them when that is deserved. It's no more complicated than that.鈥

The Journal's editorials show they are fulfilling a role as thoughtful opinion journalists and not simply advocates, said Tom Rosenstiel, a University of Maryland professor and co-author of 鈥淭he Elements of Journalism鈥 with Bill Kovach.

In that book, 鈥渨e make the point 鈥 how do you define what is the difference between pure advocacy and opinion journalism? The difference is intellectual independence, that you speak your own minds, you're not just a cheerleader,鈥 Rosenstiel said.

Is it the 鈥榮econd coming of JFK,鈥 as some in conservative media gush?

In general, the conservative media 鈥渉as been treating this like the second coming of JFK,鈥 said Howard Polskin, author of that tracks trends in that space. For every piece that offers some criticism, 鈥渢here are 15 that are gushing with praise,鈥 he said.

鈥淲e've talked and dreamed of this scenario for years, but now it's happening right in front of our eyes,鈥 Kurt Schlichter wrote in TownHall. 鈥淚t's beautiful, man. It's like the jungle exploding in a fireball in 鈥楢pocalypse Now.鈥 We love the smell of napalm in the morning. It smells like victory.鈥

On Foxnews.com, conservative columnist Hugh Hewitt said Trump had a near-perfect first week, with the only exception being the decision on security for the former presidential aides. 鈥淭rump did the governing equivalent of batting 1.000 or hitting 10 for 10 from behind the arc in the NBA,鈥 Hewitt wrote.

In two noted liberal editorial pages, The New York Times has opposed the Jan. 6 pardons but otherwise not commented editorially on Trump's early moves. Before the inauguration, the Times wrote that people by Trump. The Washington Post has called Kennedy unqualified, suggested Trump revisit plans to fire inspector generals and said the decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization was a mistake. It by Trump 鈥 and by predecessor Joe Biden.

Tuesday was also a day of celebration for many in the conservative media who felt welcome in the White House for press secretary Karoline Leavitt's first briefing. She made a point of saying she would open up the briefing room to podcasters and media influencers, along with reviewing the status of hundreds of people denied access during the Biden administration.

On social media, Monica Paige of Turning Point USA praised the 鈥渇abulous and professional briefing鈥 by Leavitt and said, 鈥渢hank you for finally giving a voice to those who have been silenced over the last four years.鈥

Natalie Winters of Steve Bannon's 鈥淲ar Room鈥 also delivered a report from the White House and said her eyes were not just going to be on the Trump administration. She said the media was going to be 鈥渢he hotbed of resistance.鈥

鈥淚'm going to be covering what President Trump is doing but, more importantly, what the mainstream media is doing in terms of lying and deceit in the narratives they're going to be crafting to neuter and nullify President Trump's America first agenda,鈥 Winters said.

___

David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and

David Bauder, The Associated Press

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks